A Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase II Study of ONC201 in Recurrent/Refractory Metastatic Breast Cancer and Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: ONC201 is a small molecule that can cause nonapoptotic cell death through loss of mitochondrial function. Results from the phase I/II trials of ONC201 in patients with refractory solid tumors demonstrated tumor responses and prolonged stable disease in some patients. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of ONC201 at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in patients with recurrent or refractory metastatic breast or endometrial cancer. Fresh tissue biopsies and blood were collected at baseline and at cycle 2 day 2 for correlative studies. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled; 10 patients with endometrial cancer, 7 patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and 5 patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The overall response rate was 0%, and the clinical benefit rate, defined by complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD), was 27% (n = 3/11). All patients experienced an adverse event (AE), which was primarily low grade. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 4 patients; no grade 4 AEs occurred. Tumor biopsies did not show that ONC201 consistently induced mitochondrial damage or alterations in tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) or the TRAIL death receptors. ONC201 treatment caused alterations in peripheral immune cell subsets. CONCLUSION: ONC201 monotherapy did not induce objective responses in recurrent or refractory metastatic breast or endometrial cancer at the RP2D dose of 625 mg weekly but had an acceptable safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03394027).

Phase I Study and Cell-Free DNA Analysis of T-DM1 and Metronomic Temozolomide for Secondary Prevention of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

PURPOSE: Preclinical data showed that prophylactic, low-dose temozolomide (TMZ) significantly prevented breast cancer brain metastasis. We present results of a phase I trial combining T-DM1 with TMZ for the prevention of additional brain metastases after previous occurrence and local treatment in patients with HER2+ breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had HER2+ breast cancer with brain metastases and were within 12 weeks of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery, and/or surgery. Standard doses of T-DM1 were administered intravenously every 21 days (3.6 mg/kg) and TMZ was given orally daily in a 3+3 phase I dose escalation design at 30, 40, or 50 mg/m2, continuously. DLT period was one 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint was safety and recommended phase II dose. Symptom questionnaires, brain MRI, and systemic CT scans were performed every 6 weeks. Cell-free DNA sequencing was performed on patients' plasma and CSF. RESULTS: Twelve women enrolled, nine (75%) with prior SRS therapy and three (25%) with prior WBRT. Grade 3 or 4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (1/12), neutropenia (1/12), lymphopenia (6/12), and decreased CD4 (6/12), requiring pentamidine for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia prophylaxis. No DLT was observed. Four patients on the highest TMZ dose underwent dose reductions. At trial entry, 6 of 12 patients had tumor mutations in CSF, indicating ongoing metastatic colonization despite a clear MRI. Median follow-up on study was 9.6 m (2.8-33.9); only 2 patients developed new parenchymal brain metastases. Tumor mutations varied with patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Metronomic TMZ in combination with standard dose T-DM1 shows low-grade toxicity and potential activity in secondary prevention of HER2+ brain metastases.

Neurologic complications of breast cancer.

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with unique neurologic complications that can arise from central nervous system (CNS) involvement or secondary to treatments themselves. As progress is made, with more targeted therapies and combinations available, particularly in the realm of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease, the role of these new agents in patients with CNS disease is gradually evolving, although intracranial efficacy itself is lagging. At the same time, both systemic and local standard therapies pose clinical challenges regarding neurologic complications, such as peripheral neuropathy and cognitive changes. The development of new agents, such as immunotherapy, and new strategies, such as incorporating systemic therapies into local therapy, unveil new presentations of neurological complications.

Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

PURPOSE: This guideline provides updated evidence-based recommendations addressing recent developments in the management of patients with brain metastases, including advanced radiation therapy techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy and the emergence of systemic therapies with central nervous system activity. METHODS: The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 4 key questions focused on the radiotherapeutic management of intact and resected brain metastases from nonhematologic solid tumors. The guideline is based on a systematic review provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Recommendations were created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS: Strong recommendations are made for SRS for patients with limited brain metastases and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Multidisciplinary discussion with neurosurgery is conditionally recommended to consider surgical resection for all tumors causing mass effect and/or that are greater than 4 cm. For patients with symptomatic brain metastases, upfront local therapy is strongly recommended. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases eligible for central nervous system-active systemic therapy, multidisciplinary and patient-centered decision-making to determine whether local therapy may be safely deferred is conditionally recommended. For patients with resected brain metastases, SRS is strongly recommended to improve local control. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases receiving whole brain radiation therapy, hippocampal avoidance and memantine are strongly recommended. For patients with poor prognosis, early introduction of palliative care for symptom management and caregiver support are strongly recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The task force has proposed recommendations to inform best clinical practices on the use of radiation therapy for brain metastases with strong emphasis on multidisciplinary care.

HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastasis: A new and exciting landscape.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BrM) incidence is 25% to 50% in women with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Radiation and surgery are currently the main local treatment approaches for central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Systemic anti-HER2 therapy following a diagnosis of BrM improves outcomes. Previous preclinical data has helped elucidate HER2 brain trophism, the blood-brain/blood-tumor barrier(s), and the brain tumor microenvironment, all of which can lead to development of novel therapeutic options. RECENT FINDINGS: Several anti-HER2 agents are currently available and reviewed here, some of which have recently shown promising effects in BrM patients, specifically. New strategies driven by and focusing on brain metastasis-specific genomics, immunotherapy, and preventive strategies have shown promising results and are under development. CONCLUSIONS: The field of HER2+ breast cancer, particularly for BrM, continues to evolve as new therapeutic strategies show promising results in recent clinical trials. Increasing inclusion of patients with BrM in clinical studies, and a focus on assessing their outcomes both intracranially and extracranially, is changing the landscape for patients with HER2+ CNS metastases by demonstrating the ability of newer agents to improve outcomes.

"Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Central Nervous System Metastases From the Laboratory to the Clinic".

ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15% to 20% of breast cancers and has an incidence as high as 50% of brain metastases once patients develop advanced disease. The lack of targeted and effective therapies, characteristic of this subtype of breast cancer, is especially evident once central nervous system (CNS) metastases occur. Compared with other subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC patients have the shorter interval from diagnosis to development of brain metastases and the shorter overall survival once they occur, a median of 4 to 6 months. Preclinical studies of TNBC and CNS microenvironment are actively ongoing, clarifying mechanisms and orienting more effective approaches to therapy. While the first drugs have been specifically approved for use in metastatic TNBC, data on their CNS effect are still awaited.

HER2 antibody-drug conjugate controls growth of breast cancer brain metastases in hematogenous xenograft models, with heterogeneous blood-tumor barrier penetration unlinked to a passive marker.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases of HER2+ breast cancer persist as a clinical challenge. Many therapeutics directed at human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are antibodies or antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and their permeability through the blood-tumor barrier (BTB) is poorly understood. We investigated the efficacy of a biparatopic anti-HER2 antibody-tubulysin conjugate (bHER2-ATC) in preclinical models of brain metastases. METHODS: The compound was evaluated in 2 hematogenous HER2+ brain metastasis mouse models, SUM190-BR and JIMT-1-BR. Endpoints included metastasis count, compound brain penetration, cancer cell proliferation, and apoptosis. RESULTS: Biparatopic HER2-ATC 3 mg/kg prevented metastasis outgrowth in the JIMT-1-BR model. At 1 mg/kg bHER2-ATC, a 70% and 92% reduction in large and micrometastases was observed. For the SUM190-BR model, an 85% and 53% reduction, respectively, in large and micrometastases was observed at 3 mg/kg, without statistical significance. Proliferation was reduced in both models at the highest dose. At the endpoint, bHER2-ATC uptake covered a median of 4-6% and 7-17% of metastasis area in the JIMT-1-BR and SUM190-BR models, respectively. Maximal compound uptake in the models was 19% and 86% in JIMT-1-BR and SUM190-BR, respectively. Multiple lesions in both models demonstrated ADC uptake in the absence or low diffusion of Texas Red Dextran, a marker of paracellular permeability. Using in vitro BTB assays, the ADC was endocytosed into brain endothelial cells, identifying a potentially new mechanism of antibody permeability. CONCLUSIONS: Biparatopic HER2-ATC significantly prevented JIMT-1-BR brain metastasis outgrowth and showed activity in the SUM190-BR model. The bHER2-ATC penetration into metastases that are impermeable to fluorescent dye suggested an endocytic mechanism of brain penetration.

Temozolomide in secondary prevention of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases.

Brain metastases occur in up to 25-55% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Standard treatment has high rates of recurrence or progression, limiting survival and quality of life in most patients. Temozolomide (TMZ) is known to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and is US FDA approved for treatment of glioblastoma. Our group has demonstrated that low doses of TMZ administered in a prophylactic, metronomic fashion can significantly prevent development of brain metastases in murine models of breast cancer. Based on these findings, we initiated a secondary-prevention clinical trial with oral TMZ given to HER2-positive breast cancer patients with brain metastases after recent local treatment in combination with T-DM1 for systemic control of disease. Primary end point is freedom from new brain metastases at 1 year. (NCT03190967).

When to Add Additional Anti-HER2 Therapy to Adjuvant Trastuzumab.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: One year of trastuzumab dramatically improves outcomes in early HER2 positive breast cancer, irrespective of anatomic stage, receptor status and chemotherapy backbone. However, up to 25% of breast cancers treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy recur. Here, we review the current role for additional HER2 blockade to adjuvant trastuzumab. RECENT FINDINGS: Adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib modestly improve disease-free survival in early breast cancer, particularly for those at highest risk of recurrence. Lack of complete pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy and HER2 targeted therapies is associated with worse outcomes. In those with lack of pCR, adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine improves outcome in early breast cancer, irrespective of chemotherapy and HER2 targeted therapy backbone. Preoperative chemotherapy and HER2 targeted therapy should be discussed in early breast cancer, especially in tumors over 2 cm. Future trials must focus on de-escalation of chemotherapy and biomarkers for further tailored therapy in early HER2 positive breast cancer.

A phase I study of the PD-L1 inhibitor, durvalumab, in combination with a PARP inhibitor, olaparib, and a VEGFR1-3 inhibitor, cediranib, in recurrent women's cancers with biomarker analyses.

BACKGROUND: Strategies to improve activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors are needed. We hypothesized enhanced DNA damage by olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, and reduced VEGF signaling by cediranib, a VEGFR1-3 inhibitor, would complement anti-tumor activity of durvalumab, a PD-L1 inhibitor, and the 3-drug combination would be tolerable. METHODS: This phase 1 study tested the 3-drug combination in a 3 + 3 dose escalation. Cediranib was taken intermittently (5 days on/2 days off) at 15 or 20 mg (dose levels 1 and 2, respectively) with durvalumab 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks, and olaparib tablets 300 mg twice daily. The primary end point was the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Response rate, pharmacokinetic (PK), and correlative analyses were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Nine patients (7 ovarian/1 endometrial/1 triple negative breast cancers, median 3 prior therapies [2-6]) were treated. Grade 3/4 adverse events include hypertension (1/9), anemia (1/9) and lymphopenia (3/9). No patients experienced dose limiting toxicities. The RP2D is cediranib, 20 mg (5 days on/2 days off) with full doses of durvalumab and olaparib. Four patients had partial responses (44%) and 3 had stable disease lasting ≥6 months, yielding a 67% clinical benefit rate. No significant effects on olaparib or cediranib PK parameters from the presence of durvalumab, or the co-administration of cediranib or olaparib were identified. Tumoral PD-L1 expression correlated with clinical benefit but cytokines and peripheral immune subsets did not. CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D is tolerable and has preliminary activity in recurrent women's cancers. A phase 2 expansion study is now enrolling for recurrent ovarian cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02484404. Registered June 29, 2015.

Update on PARP Inhibitors in Breast Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: The single agent activity of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in germline BRCA mutated (gBRCAm) breast and ovarian cancer suggests untapped potential for this new class of drug in breast cancer. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved three PARPi (olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib) so far to treat certain ovarian cancers, including those with gBRCAm and olaparib for treatment of gBRCAm breast cancers. Several PARPi are now under clinical development for breast cancer in the various treatment settings. Recently, two phase III trials of olaparib (OlympiaD) and talazoparib (EMBRACA) demonstrated 3-month progression-free survival improvement with PARPi compared to physician's choice single agent chemotherapy in metastatic gBRCAm breast cancer. To date, PARPi seems less efficacious in metastatic breast cancer patients than those with BRCA mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, perhaps reflecting the biologic heterogeneity and low somatic BRCA mutation rate in breast cancer. The use of PARPi is gradually evolving, including combination strategies with chemotherapy, targeted agents, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy in women with and without gBRCAm. The role of predictive biomarkers, including molecular signatures and homologous recombination repair deficiency scores based on loss of heterozygosity and other structural genomic aberrations, will be crucial to identify a subgroup of patients who may have benefit from PARPi. An improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying PARPi clinical resistance will also be important to enable the development of new approaches to increase efficacy. This is a field rich in opportunity, and the coming years should see a better understanding of which breast cancer patients we should treat with PARPi and where these agents should come in over the course of treatment.

Analysis of breast cancer in young women in the Department of Defense (DOD) database.

PURPOSE: Breast tumors from young women under the age of 40 account for approximately 7% of cases and have a poor prognosis independent of established prognostic factors. We evaluated the patient population served by the Military Health System, where a disproportionate number of breast cancer cases in young women are seen and treated in a single universal coverage healthcare system. METHODS: The Military Health System Repository and the DoD Central Registration databases were used to identify female breast cancer patients diagnosed or treated at military treatment facilities from 1998 to 2007. RESULTS: 10,066 women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at DoD facilities from 1998 to 2007, of which 11.3% (1139), 23.4% (2355) and 65.2% (6572) were < 40, 40-49 and > 50 years old (yo), respectively, at diagnosis. 53% in the < 40 yo cohort were white, 25% were African American (AA) and 8% were Hispanic, with 14% undisclosed. Breast cancer in women diagnosed < 40 yo was more high grade (p < 0.0001), Stage II (p < 0.0001) and ER negative (p < 0.0001). There was a higher rate of bilateral mastectomies among the women < 40 compared to those 40-49 and > 50 (18.4% vs. 9.1% and 5.0%, respectively). Independent of disease stage, chemotherapy was given more frequently to < 40 yo (90.43%) and 40-49 yo (81.44%) than ≥ 50 yo (53.71%). The 10-year overall survival of younger women was similar to the ≥ 50 yo cohort. Outcomes in the African American and Hispanic subpopulations were comparable to the overall cohort. CONCLUSION: Younger women had a similar overall survival rate to older women despite receiving more aggressive treatment.

Meaningful prevention of breast cancer metastasis: candidate therapeutics, preclinical validation, and clinical trial concerns.

The development of drugs to treat breast and other cancers proceeds through phase I dose finding, phase II efficacy, and phase III comparative studies in the metastatic setting, only then asking if metastasis can be prevented in adjuvant trials. Compounds without overt cytotoxic activity, such as those developed to inhibit metastatic colonization, will likely fail to shrink established lesions in the metastatic setting and never be tested in a metastasis prevention scenario where they were preclinically validated. We and others have proposed phase II primary and secondary metastasis prevention studies to address this need. Herein, we have asked whether preclinical metastasis prevention data agrees with the positive adjuvant setting trials. The data are limited but complimentary. We also review fundamental pathways involved in metastasis, including Src, integrins, focal adhesion kinase (FAK), and fibrosis, for their clinical progress to date and potential for metastasis prevention. Issues of inadequate preclinical validation and clinical toxicity profiles are discussed.